The ØNE That Unites The Many, By Definition
Only the Absolute can occupy the centre — and that is a matter of definition rather than of religious belief.
The argument is short enough to hold whole. Whatever else the Absolute is, by definition it is the one thing that unites the many. So if a people is going to be one body, the centre is not a matter of preference; whatever they put there either is the deepest thing or has something deeper beneath it.
The canon then walks the descent to show what that test excludes. It is tempting in this age to look shallower for what unites us — to nature, say, or to a personified goddess of nature. But any honest study finds something deeper on which she rests and depends. Keep asking what is deeper and you arrive, every time, at the one Ultimate Reality guiding the transformations of everything else across time and space. Creator is distinguished from creation not by piety but by observation: creation is always transforming, evolving, improving; its Source remains. Everything in nature rises and falls on its own wavelength — mountains over millennia, kingdoms and trees over centuries, thoughts and insects over days, subatomic cycles over nanoseconds — all of it connected back to the Source of mass-energy and the Logos that instructs it how to animate into form.
This page is the canon's strongest single move for a reader who will not accept a religious premise, and it is worth being clear about what it does and does not claim. It does not establish any particular tradition's account of the centre. It establishes only that the centre-shaped place exists, that exactly one thing can occupy it, and that anything shallower put there will be found resting on something else. The names then become what the canon always says they are — word tools honed by different peoples for the same Reality, none of them the thing (Word Tools, The Eternally Nameless, Via Negativa).
What follows practically is the whole federating logic of the canon. A body can unite around the Absolute without agreeing on its name; it cannot unite around anything less without eventually fracturing on what lies beneath it (Ultimate Unity, Federations vs Empires).
Also called: The One That Unites The Many · only the Absolute can be placed at the Center
Stands on: ØNE · Ultimate Unity · Logos · Source
Opens onto: Via Negativa · Word Tools · The Eternally Nameless · Do Not Concretize the Absolute · Theology · Metaphysics · Total Nested Holarchy Of Sovereignties · Federations vs Empires
In play: the door — the page to hand someone who says the centre is a matter of belief
Sources: LIØNSBERG Wiki Books/The Way of God/The One That Unites The Many (draft — the complete argument, with the descent through Nature, theology, philosophy, Ultimate Reality) · The Way of God/The Logos - The Eternal, Universal and Unwritten Word of God (draft) · lionsberg.wiki: The Way of God
Open: The chapter uses one tradition's vocabulary for the centre throughout while arguing a claim that is meant to be tradition-independent; the canon does not reconcile the two registers on the page. · The name-stack it gathers — Ground of Being, Uncaused Cause, I Am, the Absolute, Alpha and Omega, Source and Sustainer — is carried as aliases of ØNE rather than as concepts of their own.